JAVA.COMPARE.EQUALS : Should Use == Instead of equals() (Java)

JavaScript is not currently enabled, but is required for full CodeSonar manual search and browse functionality.

If you are viewing this file in your hub's Web GUI, enable JavaScript in your browser: you will also need it for GUI functionality.

If you opened this file directly from disk, your browser may be directly suppressing JavaScript functionality: certain browsers perform this suppression on local files (but not files delivered by web servers) for security reasons.

If you access the manual through the hub's Web GUI, the functionality will not be suppressed because the hub is a web server.
Alternatively, your browser may allow you to explicitly disable the security setting that suppresses functionality. See the CodeSonar FAQ for more information.

CodeSonar^® 9.2p0

CONFIDENTIAL

CodeSecure Inc

JAVA.COMPARE.EQUALS : Should Use == Instead of equals() (Java)

要旨

This checker identifies incorrect or inefficient comparisons through equals() or ==. In some cases, these comparisons are wrong: for instance, strings should be compared for equality through equals() rather than through ==. Classes can be safely compared through == instead. In other cases, these comparisons can be replaced by more efficient code.

プロパティ

例

// Main.java
public class Main {
  public static boolean verbose;
  private final static String[] arr = new String[] { "verbose" };

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    if (args.length > 0)
      assert !args[0].equals("");                // Comparison to Empty String (Java)    
                                                 // warning issued here. 

    if (args.length > 0 && args[0] == "verbose") // Should Use equals() Instead of == (Java)     
                                                 // warning issued here. 
      verbose = true;

    if (args.equals(arr))                        // equals on Array (Java)    
                                                 // warning issued here. 
      verbose = true;

    if (args.length > 0) {
      Main m = new Main();
      System.out.println(m.test(args[0]));
      System.out.println(m.weAreRedefined());
    }
  }

  private boolean test(Object o) {
    return o == this;                            /* == Always Fails (Java)     
                                                  * warning issued here (objects are of incompatible type:  
                                                  * a String and an instance of Main. 
                                                  */ 
  }

  public boolean weAreRedefined() {
    return !getClass().equals(Main.class);       // Should Use == Instead of equals() (Java)
                                                 // warning issued here. 
  }
}

Each of these warnings corresponds to incorrect or inefficient comparisons. The programmer should rewrite the code as follows.

// Main.java, after modification
public class Main {
  public static boolean verbose;
  private final static String[] arr = new String[] { "verbose" };

  public static void main(String[] args) {
    if (args.length > 0)
      assert !args[0].isEmpty();

    if (args.length > 0 && args[0].equals("verbose"))
      verbose = true;

    if (java.util.Arrays.equals(args, arr))
      verbose = true;

    if (args.length > 0) {
      Main m = new Main();
      //System.out.println(m.test(args[0]));
      System.out.println(m.weAreRedefined());
    }
  }

  public boolean weAreRedefined() {
    return getClass() != Main.class;
  }
}

解決法

Check if the equality is actually wrong or can be replaced by more optimized code.

関連のある設定ファイルパラメータ

設定ファイルの以下のパラメータがこのワーニングクラスのチェックに影響します。